Lest you think I am trolling the internet for these, this was also posted on Drudge (who is crazy, but his site is still best in class).
Terry Moran wrote this post commenting that we shouldn't be so easy on the "Dukies" Interesting, but sort of off base I think. And since when does a reporter comment on his own opinion?
DON'T FEEL TOO SORRY FOR THE DUKIES
Mike Nifong, the North Carolina prosecutor who pursued a case of rape and kidnapping against three Duke University lacrosse players, has been found to have been reckless and deceitful in the discharge of his duties according to the state's attorney general. He abused the power the people of Durham granted him. Based on the public record of what he did in this case, he may well be properly disbarred. The accuser in this case has been shown to be either a vicious liar or a troubled fantasist.The three young men who she accused are truly innocent of the charges brought against them according to the North Carolina Attorney General and the investigation led by his office. But perhaps the outpouring of sympathy for Reade Seligman, Collin Finnerty and David Evans is just a bit misplaced. They got special treatment in the justice system--both negative and positive. The conduct of the lacrosse team of which they were members was not admirable on the night of the incident, to say the least. And there are so many other victims of prosecutorial misconduct in this country who never get the high-priced legal representation and the high-profile, high-minded vindication that it strikes me as just a bit unseemly to heap praise and sympathy on these particular men. So as we rightly cover the vindication of these young men and focus on the genuine ordeal they have endured, let us also remember a few other things: They were part of a team that collected $800 to purchase the time of two strippers. Their team specifically requested at least one white stripper. During the incident, racial epithets were hurled at the strippers. Colin Finnerty was charged with assault in Washington, DC, in 2005. The young men were able to retain a battery of top-flight attorneys, investigators and media strategists.As students of Duke University or other elite institutions, these young men will get on with their privileged lives. There is a very large cushion under them--the one that softens the blows of life for most of those who go to Duke or similar places, and have connections through family, friends and school to all kinds of prospects for success. They are very differently situated in life from, say, the young women of the Rutgers University women's basketball team. And, MOST IMPORTANT, there are many, many cases of prosecutorial misconduct across our country every year. The media covers few, if any, of these cases. Most of the victims in these cases are poor or minority Americans--or both. I would hate to say the color of their skin is one reason journalists do not focus on these victims of injustices perpetrated by police and prosecutors, but I am afraid if we ask ourselves the question honestly, we would likely find that it is. Look for a moment at what James Giles endured:
I hope we all keep him and others in mind, as we cover the celebrated exoneration of well-heeled, well-connected, well-publicized young men whose conduct, while not illegal, was not entirely admirable, either. They aren't heroes. They aren't boys. They are young men who were victimized by a reckless prosecutor--and had the resources the fight him off.
Friday, April 13, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

1 comment:
Terry Moran wrote this post commenting that we shouldn't be so easy on
the "Dukies" Interesting, but sort of off base I think. And since when
does a reporter comment on his own opinion?
DON'T FEEL TOO SORRY FOR THE DUKIES
Mike Nifong, the North Carolina prosecutor who pursued a case of rape and
kidnapping against three Duke University lacrosse players, has been found to
have been reckless and deceitful in the discharge of his duties according to
the state's attorney general. He abused the power the people of Durham
granted him. Based on the public record of what he did in this case, he may
well be properly disbarred.
The accuser in this case has been shown to be either a vicious liar or a
troubled fantasist.
The three young men who she accused are truly innocent of the charges
brought against them according to the North Carolina Attorney General and
the investigation led by his office.
But perhaps the outpouring of sympathy for Reade Seligman, Collin Finnerty
and David Evans is just a bit misplaced. They got special treatment in the
justice system--both negative and positive. The conduct of the lacrosse team
of which they were members was not admirable on the night of the incident,
to say the least. And there are so many other victims of prosecutorial
misconduct in this country who never get the high-priced legal
representation and the high-profile, high-minded vindication that it strikes
me as just a bit unseemly to heap praise and sympathy on these particular
men.
So as we rightly cover the vindication of these young men and focus on the
genuine ordeal they have endured, let us also remember a few other things:
They were part of a team that collected $800 to purchase the time of two
strippers.
Their team specifically requested at least one white stripper.
During the incident, racial epithets were hurled at the strippers.
Colin Finnerty was charged with assault in Washington, DC, in 2005.
The young men were able to retain a battery of top-flight attorneys,
investigators and media strategists.
As students of Duke University or other elite institutions, these young men
will get on with their privileged lives. There is a very large cushion under
them--the one that softens the blows of life for most of those who go to
Duke or similar places, and have connections through family, friends and
school to all kinds of prospects for success. They are very differently
situated in life from, say, the young women of the Rutgers University
women's basketball team.
And, MOST IMPORTANT, there are many, many cases of prosecutorial misconduct
across our country every year. The media covers few, if any, of these
cases. Most of the victims in these cases are poor or minority Americans--or
both. I would hate to say the color of their skin is one reason journalists
do not focus on these victims of injustices perpetrated by police and
prosecutors, but I am afraid if we ask ourselves the question honestly, we
would likely find that it is. Look for a moment at what James Giles
I hope we all keep him and others in mind, as we cover the celebrated
exoneration of well-heeled, well-connected, well-publicized young men whose
conduct, while not illegal, was not entirely admirable, either. They aren't
heroes. They aren't boys. They are young men who were victimized by a
reckless prosecutor--and had the resources the fight him off.
------
Ken Bensinger
It's interesting that the author leaves out the fact that Finnerty's assault
case could indeed be a hate crime and not just simple assault.
---------------------
Leslie Thurman
> I wholeheartedely agree with him...don't think he's off base at all. I'm not
> shedding any tears for the three lads as they will most likely sue, obtain a
> sizable settlement, and hire top writers to co-author memoirs about their most
> terrible ordeal. I have a solution to stop the inane interviews with these
> three abused/burdened students and their sycophant attorneys -- ship the three
> lads over to DRC and let them see what real pain, injustice and horror is all
> about.
>
Ken Bensinger
It's interesting that the author leaves out the fact that Finnerty's assault
case could indeed be a hate crime and not just simple assault.
------------------------
Sean Costello
I get what you guys are saying, but remember that these students were accused of a CRIMINAL act. Just b/c they are frat brothers who go to what Moran calls an "elite school that provides them with a cushion", they were under CRIMINAL investigation for a year.
Further, I don't really understand his analogy with Rutgers basketball team. I assume he is saying that as the Dukies have more family money, more rich alumni, etc that we shouldn't feel as sorry for these students as we do for the underprivileged minority players at Rutgers.
Well...I do get his racial point as it is harder for black graduates (from any university) to get equal footing compared to white students.
On the other hand, although these Rutgers students were insulted and embarrassed (totally unnecessarily) they were NOT under criminal investigation. They did not have to spend a million dollars (purportedly) per family to address what could have been very serious issues. And their reputations are not slandered in the same way. If anything, those students have been praised as intelligent, eloquent, and successful.
I just think that we need to remember that this was not merely a theoretical discussion about race and class (which is what Moran's piece seems to be). This was a legal proceeding with legal consequences to three young men who have likely worked hard to get into of our the country's best universities.
Was it wrong to have hired strippers? Was Finnerty's other assault a hate crime? Maybe on both counts. But that doesn't give license to use the law for political reasons and exact such a personal and financial cost on these individuals.
Sean
PS I think we should start a politico/issues oriented blog for daily discussions like this. Would you guys be into that if I set it up?
--------------------------
Ken Beninger
Fine points, except we might question how hard those guys worked on getting into Duke. They were all on athletic scholarships and academic standards are considerably lower for student athletes. So the hard work was on the field, most likely.
Meanwhile, hindsight is 20/20, as they say. We now know that the investigation was, apparently, deeply in error. But it would be very hard to suggest that the DA should never have investigated this case in the first place. Imagine a society where justice refuses to investigate allegations of rape by a black woman against a white man. Oh, wait, that’s what we had in this country for several hundred years.
Finally, I think it’s a red herring to wonder whether it was right or wrong to hire strippers. It’s legal in N. Carolina. And if everything is consensual, then it’s nobody’s business. The problem is when things get unconsensual, as was alleged.
The Rutgers hoops stuff seems totally irrelevant to me. Much more on point, and as far as I can tell, rarely mentioned, is Tom Wolfe’s “Bonfire of the Vanities.” White I-banker hits and runs a poor black kid and justice catches up to him. In that case he was guilty, but the buried racial and class angers that swell up because of the case seem fascinatingly parallel.
Post a Comment